![]() And in behavioral detection tests–which checks how well antivirus software recognizes malware based solely on what it attempts to do–G Data again led the pack by blocking 12 out of 15 test samples. G Data’s dominance continued on heuristic tests that use two-week-old signature databases and newer malware to simulate how well a program can detect threats that don’t yet have a signature. In this test, G Data blocked 71.9 percent of the samples used by –again, the best mark we saw. G DATA AntiVirus 2010, 3 - 25 Users, 3 Years 20031 Dépliant. But its cleanup leaves behind way too much, it rendered one test system. G Data’s dominance continued on heuristic tests that use two-week-old signature databases and newer malware to simulate how well a program can detect threats that don’t yet have a signature. AntiVirus 2010, 3 - 25 Users, 3 Years - leggi il manuale online o scaricalo in formato PDF. NEW: Top security with no loss of PC performance A new era is beginning: For the fi rst time, the usual optimum high security from. G Data has its good points, notably accurate phishing protection and behavioral analysis that avoids false positives. It was likewise strong at blocking annoying adware, running up a 99.8 percent score, and these strengths helped it earn top billing. That double coverage may have helped it rack up an impressive 99.95 percent block rate for traditional, signature-based detection of known malware, a rate better than that of any other app we tested. Most security programs use a single antivirus engine, but the German-made G Data ($25 for a one-year, single-PC license, as of 11/20/09) uses two separate engines: BitDefender and Avast.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |